Apostrophic Disasters: Or What I Hate about Fantasy Fiction

I’m not just a writer: I’m a reader. I write fantasy fiction primarily because it’s what I’m drawn to. I read fantasy fiction. In my newly rediscovered passion for writing, I’ve been reading a lot of books on what to do, what not to do, and that sort of thing. Of course, that’s a subject for a completely different blog.

However, in this blog I’d like to address my pet peeves in fantasy writing. Why? Because these are things I do not want to ever catch myself doing. EVER.

Apostrophe abuse: Books infused with obsessive, unnecessary, and prolific apostrophes in names. The only reason I can think anyone does this is to somehow make these names seem “exotic.” They only serve to annoy me. Seriously, people…get over yourselves already. One or two names with an apostrophe I can see, maybe. Using them in certain “tribes” and not in others, maybe. Put every other proper name or place-name is just irresponsible apostrophe use. All it does is distract me from what is going on in the book.

Q and X abuse, etc: Q and X are two of the least-used letters in the English language. As a result, some authors think that in order to let you know the book is in some other plane of existence, they have to have lots and lots of rarely used letters in their place and/or proper names. Really? If your plot and your descriptions don’t give me the idea that it’s a fantasy novel, your Qs and Xs aren’t going to help. The more complicated the pronunciation, the more distracted I am from what the plot is and who the characters are. Pretty much the same peeve as the apostrophe problem and, ironically (or not), you’ll often find these two techniques combined.

Tolkien abuse: (Also occasionally D & D abuse). Tolkien was a brilliant writer. He created a world loosely based off of this world’s folklore, but he made it his. That’s his, not yours. Leave his elves, dwarves, and dragons alone, dammit! If you want to use them, that’s up to you…but when I get the feeling that the person is just playing in Middle Earth, I lose interest. Calling a Hobbit a Halfling isn’t going to fool me, either. That just means you’re taking a page from the D & D Player’s Manual. Elves, dwarves, and dragons are fine…but why can’t you make your own rules with them? Change it up a bit? I guess this wouldn’t bother me if it weren’t so prevalent out there…What I love about the fantasy genre is that you’ve got this wonderful chance to create an entire world from scratch. I wish more authors would take advantage of it instead of relying on someone else’s imagination.

Arthur, Arthur, Arthur… There was a point in time when I was obsessed with the “Matter of Britain,” I admit it. I still have many of these books: Forever King, The Crystal Cave, Mists of Avalon, along with many, many others. After awhile however, I realized it’s just like the Titanic. (How many Titanic movies do we need, really?) Yes, the Titanic always sinks, and Arthur always dies. The story is always the same. Slightly different takes on the characters, slightly different takes on the time period, but the plot line can’t change. This dead horse has been beaten to a pulp. There are some more-than-great books on the subject of King Arthur, but I think it’s really time we move along now. The Forever King is a wonderful exception as it covers King Arthur returning again…and is exceedingly well done. If you’ve got a good twist like that, go for it. Otherwise…well, I’m not reading it!

Vampires, Werewolves, Zombies, and Mummies: Honestly, I don’t think of these books as being “fantasy” per se, but some certainly don’t fit into the category of “horror” either. Let’s face it, the only thing horrible about Twilight is the writing. (And the acting if we’re talking about the movie). For once and for all kids, Vampires do not sparkle.


I personally do not understand the need to make vampires sexy. I admit, there are a lot of people out there with a vampire fetish. But I think of those vampires as some completely different kind of creature. We really ought to create a whole new term for them, honestly.Vampires, from the folk legends, should be frightening, ugly, and smelly. (Yes, smelly. Rotting flesh is one of the least sexy smells I can personally think of!)

And again, many authors are leaning heavily on other author’s creations. Vampires have now been done, re-done, and over-done. Does this mean we can’t be creative about it? Well, no. Mercedes Lackey (insert bowing and scraping gesture: She’s one of the demi-goddesses of my pantheon, to be elevated to Godhood after her passing from this realm), in a couple of her Diana Tregarde novels had vampires. In Children of the Night she had a couple of different varieties even; bloodsuckers, emotional suckers, and soul-suckers. They were amazingly frightening…well, except for the bloodsucker, who turned out to be an ok-kind of guy. But with other horrifying vampires in the mix, I can forgive her for having one sexy one.

Werewolves fall into the same category of being over-done. They’re also bordering on being over-sexified as well. After all, once we’ve abused and saturated the vampire market, where else can we go?

Zombies and Mummies fall into the same heading for me. There was only one Mummy that ever made sense to me…and that was because of the whole Egyptian curse concept. Otherwise…yeah, not going there. And zombies really piss me off on many levels…not the least of which is that the root of the subject is from a little-understood magical practice in Voodoo…or so they say. Mousie has a fabulous theory about the word “zombie” and where it might actually have come from which would have little at all in common with the concept of physical “walking dead.” If you’re going to animate the dead, leave Voodoo alone. There are actually myths from China that have some exceedingly frightening walking dead…as well as some Native American myths. Go play with those, if you must. Of course, if you’re going to play with those you might actually be writing horror, not fantasy…and good for you if you do! Some things just don’t belong in the happy fluffy bunny world of fantasy.

Happy Fluffy Bunny World: Pretty much gets my central nervous system into convulsions. This is the ultimate combination of all those happy fairy-tales from childhood…unicorns, flying horses, angels, and all the Tolkien creations. Otherwise known as Narnia disease. Build up this pretty little “My Little Pony” world and then create some big bad guy to destroy it all, create unlikely heroes and have all the happy fluffy bunnies band together at the end to get rid of the big ugly bad guy. Put the pen/laptop down and slowly walk away…

So now that I have vented about my peeves, does this mean I’m avoiding all of them? Well, no, not really. Because in writing fiction, it’s pretty much assumed that it will involve some sort of “fairy” type creatures whether Tolkien, D & D, or Narnian. However, I am taking some efforts to ensure that my creations are different. I’m going back into the folklore from my own childhood, looking for the things that resonated with me, the things that scared me silly, the things that gave me nightmares as a child. I’m looking at the different creatures and revitalizing them, trying to think where they would have come from, what they would eat, what their mating and nesting habits really would be. Hell, I’ve even read an entire physics diatribe about whether or not angels and flying horses (pegasi) would physically be able to fly, and what would be necessary in order for that to happen. It was fascinating.

See, these are my creations, in my world, with my rules. They’re also my characters…but again, that’s a blog for a different day…


About Camylleon

I don't need gurus, and sure don't want to be one. I'm not here to buy stuff or to sell it. I am just another spiritual wanderer, trying to figure it all out. My blend? A little Santeria, a little Polytheism, a little Spiritism and shake gently. Comments are closed...because I detest drama. I'm not completely anti-social though. If you've got questions, shoot me a email. Camylleon at hotmail dot com...
This entry was posted in Writing and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Apostrophic Disasters: Or What I Hate about Fantasy Fiction

  1. FlyingPoppet says:

    I heartily second all of those!

    Ooh can I add some of my own peeves?

    Placing your setting in a completely different world/plane but insisting on having something from our world in it and attempting to make it fit in by only changing the spelling. One frequently abused item is coffee, which was respelled “kaffie” in one particularly bad example.

    The concept of “paranormal romance” as a genre. I know the publishing industry thinks there needs to be a category in which to place all the cute and sexy monsters, but that place used to be straight romance or urban fantasy or one of many other categories. Paranormal Romance just cries out as an attempt to manufacture a market.

    I think that’s it for now…

    • Camylleon says:

      AGREE!!! Kaffie? Seriously? Ugh.

      I know…”paranormal romance” is a stretch as a genre. Although…at least it keeps those books out of the horror and fantasy sections. Let’s face it…the only thing horrible about them is the writing, and they cover a completely different kind of fantasy. Ahem.

      • Jessica says:

        I loved everything about this post. I write too, and like all writers, I read. I have to jump on board with all of the extremely spot-on pet peeves you have listed. If I find that I just can’t get myself past a second or third chapter of a book, I can usually examine it and determine that one (usually more) of the above listed violations is occurring flagrantly.

        • Camylleon says:

          I used to be more open minded. I don’t know if the symptoms are just getting worse…or I’m getting old enough that I won’t waste my time! I remember a looooong time ago I used to say that there was always something about a book that was good. Character, plot, descriptive prose…something that redeemed it and made it worth reading all the way through. Now…I’m much more picky and find myself losing attention. Once upon a time, I would always finish a book. Not so much anymore! It’s nice to see that I’m not alone!

  2. Pingback: Looks Like I Hit a Nerve! Completely Unscheduled Post! | Camylleon's Cave

  3. Kitten says:

    Even though it’s arguably proper, one of my biggest pet peeves – and the reason I scarcely read Nora Roberts – is starting a sentence with ‘and’. All the time. Like, every three sentences. It drives me absolutely bonkers, along with everything else you listed ;A;

  4. Camylleon says:

    Ugh! I didn’t even get into GRAMMATICAL issues. Blah.

    I don’t read much Nora Roberts although i will confess I have. My mom was a fan for a bit, and threw a couple my way she thought I would “just love.” *shrug* I can’t even adequately explain why I don’t like romance fiction. It’s written differently…and even when it’s not completely formulaic, I can tell the difference in writing style, and it just annoys me for some reason.

    And…(giggle) that *is* annoying. As far as I was aware, that’s “proper” as an exception, not the rule. For impact. Like short sentences. Not to be abused every three sentences!

  5. ljwitch says:

    Sparkly Vampires make LJ a very, very homicidal blogger. Thanks for this entry, I agree!

  6. Pingback: To Err is Human | Camylleon's Cave

  7. Camylleon says:

    For the record, I am standing by this post as well as the retort. I mean…aside from the personal jabs, which were unnecessary and harsh…bordering on downright rude. I know better than that. I made it out of kindergarten, for Pete’s sake. However…

    I still think apostrophes are often abused. I still stand by the annoyance with overly-exotic names, and I still stand by my original complaint about lack of originality. I think the blog post that criticized my criticism missed an important detail about that. I did *not* say people can’t use elves and such…I referred to it as Tolkien (or D & D) abuse. Simply that authors should make it *their own*. Mix it up a bit. Give it a twist. Of course, from that perspective, Stephanie Meyers is okay…(*shudder* I can’t believe I just wrote that) but then, that might be the only context in which she is acceptable.

    And once and for all, I still think that creatures of horror belong in horror. I did allow in the original post for the exception…even referring to a Mercedes Lackey FANTASY novel that had vampires.

    For every “rule” there is an exception.

    And again, this is what bothers ME…not YOU. I do NOT mean to impress my opinions and my standards upon anyone else at all. I expect others to have different opinions. I expect my opinion to be respected as what it is. I also expect myself to respect other opinions, which is something I will try to do more proficiently in the future.

  8. The whole apostrophe thing drives me round the bend. It doesn’t make names sound more exotic, it just makes them impossible to read! Some of my most favouritest writers do this. They should know better! One of my peeves is when an author seems to have a favourite word of the month and they use it over and over again. ‘Simply’ was one that stuck in my mind by Robert Newcomb. “No, thankyou,” he said simply. “Oh, okay then,” she replied simply. How do you say something simply? Enough already!

    • Camylleon says:

      Yes! I try to avoid that, myself. In fact I’m quite obsessive about seeking out alternative words or phrasing because it’s easy to become dependent on adjectives. On the other hand, if you take that to the extreme, you end up sounding like a thesaurus which doesn’t work, either…

      No, I don’t think “simply” should be used like that…and more importantly shouldn’t be used in the same conversation that way! “It’s simple,” sure. To say something simply, though? Makes me think of “simple Simon,” lol.

  9. kenziekay says:

    Oh my goodness, you’ve highlighted pretty much every problem I’ve been having lately with fantasy fiction! I really like the genre, but outside of Tolkien and a few other authors, it’s really hard to find “authentic” fantasy fiction. More often than not, I put a book back on the shelf in a bookstore for one or more of these reasons. Oh it haves elves and dwarves? *Re-shelf* Glittery vampires and werewolves? *Re-shelf* Strange names I can’t pronounce? *Re-shelf*

    • Camylleon says:

      Ugh…yes…its horrible, isn’t it? I don’t mind so much if someone’s going to have elves, but for the love of all that’s holy, do *your own elves*! Same thing with vampires. The lack of originality, the laziness, the taking advantage of someone else’s genius to make a couple of bucks…really gets to me. I’m reflecting more and more on what bothers me as I attempt to create my own world. I guess in some ways I’m becoming a little more critical, and it might sound like I’m enjoying reading less, but I’m not. I still enjoy reading…I’m just making notes as to what traps I don’t want to step in, y’know?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s